Free Commerce vs. National Security: Is There Really a Contradiction?

dc.contributor.authorEland, Ivan
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-05T13:43:34Z
dc.date.available2024-06-05T13:43:34Z
dc.date.issued2005-03-21
dc.description.abstractThe article "Free Commerce vs. National Security: Is There Really a Contradiction?" by Ivan Eland examines the conflict between free trade and national security using the Bush administration's opposition to a proposed natural gas pipeline from Iran through Pakistan to India as a case study. The administration opposed the pipeline to isolate Iran, despite the pipeline's potential to foster economic development and peace in South Asia. Eland argues that free commerce can reduce conflict and promote Western values over time, while sanctions and military actions are often counterproductive. He calls for a more thoughtful approach to national security that embraces free trade as a means to enhance global stability.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2450/13593
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInstitute for Social Policy and Understanding (ISPU)
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries 1: Articles
dc.titleFree Commerce vs. National Security: Is There Really a Contradiction?
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Free Commerce vs National Security Is There Really a Contradiction.pdf
Size:
55.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.19 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections